Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Measure Would Ban Smoking In All Public Buildings
WCCO News Online / AP ^ | 2/19/04 | WCCO

Posted on 02/19/2004 9:51:00 AM PST by Johnny Gage

Feb 19, 2004 7:31 am US/Central St. Paul (AP) Rep. Ron Latz said a bill that would ban smoking in all public buildings, including bars and restaurants, "catches Minnesota up with other states."

Latz, DFL-St. Louis Park, and Sen. Scott Dibble, DFL-Minneapolis, planned a news conference Thursday to announce their measure that also would ban or restrict smoking in places of employment such as taxicabs, day-care centers and residential health care facilities.

The bill is strongly supported by the Minnesota Smoke-Free Coalition, a statewide organization consisting of large health care companies. "We have been pushing this since our founding in 1984," said Jeremy Hanson, public policy director.

"It's a personal right," he said. "People have the right to breathe in public without inhaling secondhand smoke. You shouldn't have to sacrifice your life to hold a job, whether you work in a bank or a bar."

Hanson said Health Department studies show smoking costs the state $2.6 billion annually in medical costs and lost productivity. And there are no proven economic disadvantages to going smoke-free, for a city, county, state or business, he said.

"Even in Duluth, which is the largest smoke-free city in the state, they have seen an increase in sales in restaurants and bars. That's based on unbiased sales tax receipts," Hanson said.

Latz said the bill would go into the legislative hopper by Friday afternoon. If it passes, most of the provisions would take effect July 1. A minor criminal penalty for violators would take effect Aug. 1.

"It's modeled on the New York law, which was a bipartisan effort," Latz said of the bill. "It catches Minnesota up with other states."

Minnesota in 1975 became the first state in the nation to restrict smoking in public buildings. While the rules have been tweaked and tightened over the years, Minnesota has fallen behind states such as California, New York, Delaware and Connecticut, which have banned smoking in bars and restaurants.

The hospitality industry has argued that bars and restaurants should be allowed to decide on their own whether to go smoke-free.

Tom Day, vice president of government affairs for Hospitality Minnesota, an umbrella group representing the state's restaurants, hotels and resorts, said 38 communities around the state have attempted to pass smoking bans in recent years but only four -- Duluth, Moose Lake, Cloquet and Olmsted County -- have succeeded.

"Before those cities went smoke-free, 25 percent of our restaurants had gone smoke-free," Day said. "The business community is moving in that direction, but we don't believe the government should tell us how to operate as it sees fit."


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; Government; US: Minnesota
KEYWORDS: antismoking; pufflist; smokingbans
The Anti-smoking Nazis are gearing up in Minnesota.
1 posted on 02/19/2004 9:51:00 AM PST by Johnny Gage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 2grit; 7beuties; Abe Froman; Abigail Adams; AdGal; Aeronaut; AFCdt; akorahil; allodialman; ...

"Bloomberg-esque" policies coming to Minnesota

2 posted on 02/19/2004 9:53:20 AM PST by Johnny Gage (God Bless our Firefighters, our Police, our EMS responders, and most of all, our Veterans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Johnny Gage
This is so stupid. I mean really, really stupid.
3 posted on 02/19/2004 10:18:59 AM PST by freekitty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Johnny Gage
"St. Paul (AP) Rep. Ron Latz said a bill that would ban smoking in all public buildings, including bars and restaurants,"

CONSTITUTION OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA

Adopted October 13, 1857 * Generally revised November 5, 1974 Further amended November 1974, 1980, 1982, 1984, 1988, 1990, 1996 and 1998.

ARTICLE I BILL OF RIGHTS

Sec. 15. LANDS ALLODIAL; VOID AGRICULTURAL LEASES. All lands within the state are allodial...

The defninition of "allodial:"

"Pertaining to allodium; freehold; free of rent or service; held independent of a lord paramount; -- opposed to feudal;"

The defintion of "allodium:"

"...land which is the absolute property of the owner; real estate held in absolute independence, without being subject to any rent, service, or acknowledgment to a superior."

It is rather obvious that Rep. Ron Latz has proposed a blatantly unconstitutional bill because according the Minnesota Constitution, the property of bars and restaurants are "allodial," and the "absolute property of the owner."

Minnesota residents, rise up and exert your rights enumerated in your state Constitution.

4 posted on 02/19/2004 10:22:51 AM PST by tahiti
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Johnny Gage
catches Minnesota up with other states

In a race to the bottom!

5 posted on 02/19/2004 10:27:44 AM PST by MamaTexan (Is anyone obligated to obey an unconstitutional government?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Johnny Gage
Arnold should just smoke when and where he wants and issue himself a blanket pardon.
6 posted on 02/19/2004 10:46:06 AM PST by sphinx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Johnny Gage
Sadly, it seems like the anti-smoking brigade is unstoppable.

7 posted on 02/19/2004 10:46:21 AM PST by Eurotwit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Johnny Gage
Didnt Duluth do something like this?
8 posted on 02/19/2004 12:21:06 PM PST by wallcrawlr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Johnny Gage
I grew up in SLP what has happened to my beloved city??? DFLer's are taking over.
9 posted on 02/19/2004 9:22:07 PM PST by Brimack34
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Johnny Gage
Looks like the only smoke the Minnesota RAT's endorse is the smokescreen they wrap around their subversion of freedom. Of course, the fumes of brimstone and bitumen are like incense to the RAT's since they are spawned in, and crawl up from, hell. But I digress.

Staying on topic...

At your March 2nd precinct caucus, you might want to put a resolution forward to the effect that any public building that does not care to restrict smoking should not be forced to do so. Citing the state's constitution from Tahiti's post #4, you should be able to pass the resolution in your precinct if you have a quarum of real Republicans present.

Put yourself on the ballot for the district convention and get elected. At the district, defend the measure and move it on to the state level. Be certain that you are elected to be a delegate for the next level and, thus, continue to shepard your resolution to the top. The state level will also give you a voice in assuring ever more conservative candidates from the bottom working their way up - the key to having an effect at higher levels.

Since you are all good FReepers, a good resume for getting elected as a delegate to the next level is to simply state that you are a staunch conservative commited to expanding liberty and the upholding of the American constitution. The credentials most grassroots types are looking for are no-nonsense hardline conservatism. This has always worked for me and, I think, it will work for you too.

As an aside, ask the next anti-smoking Obersturmbahnfuhrer if they also oppose the legalization of marijuana. Might spark a good discussion.
10 posted on 02/20/2004 4:47:08 PM PST by WorkingClassFilth (DEFUND PBS & NPR - THE AMERICAN PRAVDA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Johnny Gage; *puff_list; SheLion; Just another Joe; Mears; metesky; Madame Dufarge; lockjaw02; ...
A couple of days old - but slid under my radar screen.......
11 posted on 02/22/2004 8:42:20 AM PST by Gabz (Smoke gnatzies: small minds buzzing in your business - SWAT'EM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WorkingClassFilth
As an aside, ask the next anti-smoking Obersturmbahnfuhrer if they also oppose the legalization of marijuana. Might spark a good discussion.

The ex-wife a good friend of mine was adamantly anti-cigarette-smoking. No one was permitted to smoke in the house, including my friend because she disliked it and didn't want their daughter around it. fine, I respect her rules in her house. But it would absolutely gall me when coming back into the house after stepping out for a cigarette she would be sitting in the living room smoking a joint, and their daughter was in the next room

I've got nothing against folks smoking marijuana - but that to me was the absolute height of hypocracy.

12 posted on 02/22/2004 8:46:26 AM PST by Gabz (Smoke gnatzies: small minds buzzing in your business - SWAT'EM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Gabz; *puff_list; Just another Joe; Great Dane; Max McGarrity; Madame Dufarge; MeeknMing; ...
Mine too!

~Puff~

13 posted on 02/22/2004 8:54:14 AM PST by SheLion (Curiosity killed the cat BUT satisfaction brought her back!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: SheLion
Sheesh - but aren't we busy for a sunday morning/afternoon!!!!!!

LOL!!!!
14 posted on 02/22/2004 9:01:53 AM PST by Gabz (Smoke gnatzies: small minds buzzing in your business - SWAT'EM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Johnny Gage
Has anyone ever asked for proof that smoking costs the state $2.6 billion in medical costs?

I sometimes wonder how they come up with these figures,they make absolutely no sense to me.

If someone said they flew a few times on a smokey plane 20 years ago and then dies of heart failure is that a smoking related death? My kids were raised in a smokey home and are now all middle aged non-smokers.. If one of them dies 30 years from now with lung disease would that be considered a smoking related death?

Why is the state picking up the bills on all these medical expenses anyway? Most of us have our own medical coverage.

Lies,lies,and more lies!!!!!


15 posted on 02/22/2004 9:25:01 AM PST by Mears (The Killer Queen---caviar and cigarettes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson